How to Review Property Investment Companies in the Midlands (Complete Evaluation Guide)
- rhianne193
- Oct 15
- 13 min read
After over 15+ years working in property investment across Leicester, Nottingham, Warwickshire, and Northamptonshire, we've seen investors make excellent choices - and costly mistakes - when selecting property investment companies.
The difference between a great property investment partner and a poor one can cost you tens of thousands of pounds. A good company delivers below-market deals, accurate projections, and reliable management. A bad one overcharges, overpromises, and underdelivers.
In this brutally honest guide, we'll show you exactly how to evaluate property investment companies in the Midlands. We'll give you the specific questions to ask, the red flags to watch for, and the criteria that actually matter.
Why Most Investors Choose Property Companies Badly
Before we dive into the evaluation framework, let's address why investors make poor choices:
They Choose Based on Promises, Not Track Record: A company promises 12% returns and guaranteed capital growth. Sounds great - but can they prove it? Most investors don't ask for evidence.
They Don't Understand Fee Structures: A 3% sourcing fee sounds cheaper than 5% - but if the 3% company delivers properties at market value while the 5% company negotiates 12% discounts, which is actually cheaper?
They Skip Due Diligence on the Company Itself: Investors demand due diligence on properties but don't research the companies they're trusting with £300,000+ investments.
They Confuse Marketing with Expertise: Slick websites, professional brochures, and confident sales pitches don't equal genuine local knowledge or investor results.
They Don't Check References: Would you hire an employee without checking references? Yet investors engage property companies managing six-figure investments without speaking to a single existing client.
The Complete Property Investment Company Evaluation Framework
Here's how to properly evaluate any property investment company operating in the Midlands:
1. Geographic Expertise and Local Knowledge
Property investment is hyper-local. A street-by-street understanding of Leicester, Nottingham, Warwickshire, and Northamptonshire markets is essential.
Questions to Ask:
"How long have you operated specifically in [Leicester/Nottingham/Warwickshire/Northamptonshire]?" - You want companies with 5+ years in your target location, not national companies with superficial regional coverage.
"Which specific areas do you recommend for investment, and which do you avoid?" - Genuine local experts know which streets are good investments and which to avoid. If they can't give specific street names and reasons, they lack real knowledge.
"What's the average void period for properties you manage in [specific area]?" - Real data from managed properties proves local expertise. Vague answers or "industry averages" suggest limited experience.
"How do rental rates in [specific street] compare to [nearby street]?" - Test their micro-market knowledge. Rental rates can vary 15-20% between streets two blocks apart.
"What are the main tenant demographics in [area], and how is this changing?" - Understanding tenant demand trends is crucial for long-term investment success.
Red Flags:
Vague answers about "good investment areas" without specific locations
Inability to discuss micro-market differences within cities
National company with no local office or staff in your target area
Recently entered the Midlands market (less than 3 years)
Can't provide specific void period data from managed properties
What Good Looks Like:
A Leicester specialist should say: "We focus on Clarendon Park, Knighton, and Oadby for professional tenants - average void periods of 4-6%. We avoid Highfields and parts of Belgrave due to higher tenant turnover and maintenance issues. In Hinckley, the Hollycroft area offers better capital growth than the town center. Current rents in Clarendon Park are £850-950 for two-beds, versus £750-850 in Evington."
2. Pricing Transparency and Total Cost Analysis
Many investors focus only on sourcing fees and miss the total cost picture.
Questions to Ask:
"What is your exact sourcing fee structure?" - Get it in writing. Is it a percentage of purchase price, a flat fee, or a combination?
"Are there any additional fees beyond the sourcing fee?" - Some companies charge "due diligence fees," "arrangement fees," or "administration fees" on top of sourcing fees.
"What discount from market value do you typically achieve?" - If they charge 5% but deliver 12% discounts, you're ahead. If they charge 3% but source at market value, you're overpaying.
"What are your property management fees?" - Typical range is 8-15% of monthly rent. Get the exact percentage and what it includes.
"What maintenance and repair costs should I budget annually?" - Realistic companies quote £800-1,500 annually for standard buy-to-let properties. Optimistic companies quote £300-500.
"Do you receive any commissions from mortgage brokers, solicitors, or contractors?" - Undisclosed commissions create conflicts of interest.
Red Flags:
Reluctance to disclose fees in writing
Multiple additional fees beyond the stated sourcing fee
Can't or won't provide evidence of typical discounts achieved
Management fees above 15% without clear justification
Hidden commissions from referred service providers
Pressure to use their recommended mortgage broker, solicitor, or surveyor
What Good Looks Like:
"Our sourcing fee is 5% of the purchase price, paid on completion. No additional fees. We typically achieve 10-15% discounts from market value on off-market deals - I can show you three recent examples with independent valuations. Property management is 10% of monthly rent, including tenant finding, rent collection, inspections, and maintenance coordination. You should budget £1,000-1,200 annually for maintenance. We don't receive commissions from any service providers we recommend."
3. Track Record and Proven Results
Past performance doesn't guarantee future results, but it's the best indicator you have.
Questions to Ask:
"Can you provide three case studies from the last 12 months with specific numbers?" - Recent results are most relevant. You want purchase price, market value, discount achieved, projected vs actual rental income, and void periods.
"Can I speak to three investors who purchased properties through you in the last year?" - Recent references matter most. Be suspicious if they only offer references from 3+ years ago.
"What percentage of your projected rental incomes are achieved in reality?" - Good companies achieve 90-95% of projections. Poor companies project optimistically and deliver 70-80%.
"What's your average void period across all managed properties?" - Midlands market average is 6-8%. Companies achieving 4-6% demonstrate strong management. Above 10% is concerning.
"How many properties have you sourced in the Midlands in the last 12 months?" - This shows deal flow and market activity. Be cautious of companies sourcing fewer than 10-15 properties annually.
"What's the biggest mistake you've made with an investor, and how did you resolve it?" - Honest companies acknowledge mistakes and explain resolutions. Perfect track records are suspicious.
Red Flags:
Won't provide specific case studies with verifiable numbers
Can't or won't provide recent investor references
All case studies show perfect results with no issues
Vague about actual rental income achieved vs projections
Limited deal flow (fewer than 10 properties annually)
Defensive or evasive when asked about mistakes or problems
What Good Looks Like:
"Here are three recent deals: Property 1 - Leicester, purchased £248k, market value £285k, 13% discount. Projected rent £1,100, achieving £1,075. Void period 3 weeks. Property 2 - Nottingham, purchased £172k, market value £195k, 12% discount. Projected rent £850, achieving £825. Void period 5 weeks. Property 3 - Northampton, purchased £278k, market value £320k, 13% discount. Projected rent £1,250, achieving £1,250. Void period 2 weeks. I'll connect you with all three investors. Our average void period across 47 managed properties is 5.2%. We sourced 23 properties last year. Our biggest mistake was underestimating refurbishment costs on a Nottingham property by £8,000 - we split the overrun with the investor 50/50."
4. Due Diligence Process and Risk Management
Comprehensive due diligence is what separates professional companies from cowboys.
Questions to Ask:
"What specific due diligence do you conduct on every property?" - You want structural surveys, planning history checks, local area analysis, comparable sales research, rental demand verification, and legal issue identification.
"Do you arrange independent structural surveys on all properties?" - "Independent" is key. Surveys arranged through the seller or estate agent aren't truly independent.
"How do you verify rental demand and projected rental income?" - Good companies use actual data from managed properties and recent lettings. Poor companies use advertised rents from Rightmove.
"What happens if a survey reveals significant issues?" - Do they renegotiate, walk away, or pressure you to proceed anyway?
"Can I see an example of your financial projections?" - Review the assumptions. Are void periods realistic (6-8%)? Are maintenance costs realistic (£800-1,500 annually)? Are they including all costs?
"What percentage of deals fall through after due diligence?" - If 100% of deals proceed, they're not conducting rigorous due diligence. Expect 10-20% to fall through when issues are discovered.
Red Flags:
Vague or superficial due diligence process
Don't arrange independent structural surveys
Rental projections based on advertised rents, not actual data
Pressure to proceed despite survey issues
Optimistic financial projections (low void periods, low maintenance costs)
100% of deals proceed (suggests inadequate due diligence)
What Good Looks Like:
"Every property gets a full structural survey from an independent RICS surveyor, planning history check, local area analysis including crime rates and school ratings, comparable sales research from the last 6 months, and rental demand verification using actual lettings data from our managed properties. We project 7% void periods and £1,100 annual maintenance for standard properties. If a survey reveals issues, we renegotiate or walk away - approximately 15% of deals fall through after due diligence. Here's an example financial projection showing all assumptions and costs."
5. Property Management Quality and Tenant Relationships
Management quality directly impacts your returns. Poor management means higher void periods, lower rents, and more maintenance issues.
Questions to Ask:
"What is your average void period across all managed properties?" - Midlands average is 6-8%. Good management achieves 4-6%.
"How do you screen tenants?" - You want credit checks, employment verification, previous landlord references, and right-to-rent checks.
"What's your average tenant retention rate?" - Good companies retain 60-70% of tenants beyond initial tenancy. High turnover increases costs.
"How quickly do you respond to maintenance emergencies?" - You want same-day response for emergencies, 48-hour response for urgent issues.
"How do you handle rent arrears?" - Clear process for late payment follow-up, payment plans, and eviction if necessary.
"Can I speak to three landlords whose properties you currently manage?" - Current management clients provide the most relevant feedback.
"What property management software do you use?" - Professional companies use dedicated software (Goodlord, Arthur, etc.) for transparency and efficiency.
Red Flags:
Void periods consistently above 8-10%
Vague or minimal tenant screening process
High tenant turnover (most tenants leave after initial tenancy)
Slow maintenance response times
No clear rent arrears process
Won't provide current landlord references
Manual processes without professional software
What Good Looks Like:
"Our average void period is 4.8% across 47 managed properties. We conduct full credit checks, employment verification, and previous landlord references on all tenants. 68% of our tenants renew beyond their initial tenancy. We respond to emergencies within 2 hours, urgent issues within 24 hours. Rent arrears trigger immediate contact, payment plan if needed, and Section 8 proceedings if unresolved within 2 months. I'll connect you with three current landlords. We use Arthur property management software - you'll have 24/7 access to your property dashboard."
6. Service Range and Ongoing Support
Property investment doesn't end at purchase. Ongoing support matters.
Questions to Ask:
"What services do you offer beyond property sourcing?" - Integrated companies offering sourcing, management, and maintenance provide better coordination.
"If I don't use your management services, will you still provide ongoing support?" - Some companies only support clients who use their management services.
"How do you handle property issues that arise after purchase?" - Good companies help resolve issues even if they're not managing the property.
"Do you provide portfolio strategy advice as my investments grow?" - Valuable for investors building multi-property portfolios.
"What happens if I want to sell a property you sourced?" - Some companies offer resale support, others don't.
Red Flags:
Only offer sourcing with no management or ongoing support
Require you to use their management services
No support after purchase unless you're paying ongoing fees
No portfolio strategy advice for growing investors
Disappear after the sourcing fee is paid
What Good Looks Like:
"We offer property sourcing, full management, maintenance coordination, and portfolio strategy consulting. You're not required to use our management - we'll support you regardless. If issues arise after purchase, we'll help resolve them even if we're not managing. We provide ongoing portfolio strategy advice at no additional cost. If you decide to sell, we'll support the process and can recommend agents."
7. Transparency and Communication Style
How a company communicates tells you a lot about how they operate.
Questions to Ask:
"What are the main risks with property investment in the Midlands?" - Honest companies discuss risks openly. Sales-focused companies minimize or ignore risks.
"What could go wrong with this specific property?" - Every property has potential issues. Honest assessment builds trust.
"What's your typical response time for investor questions?" - You want same-day response for urgent issues, 24-48 hours for general questions.
"How do you report on property performance?" - Monthly statements, annual summaries, and accessible online dashboards are standard.
"What happens if we disagree about a management decision?" - Clear process for resolving disagreements matters.
Red Flags:
Only discuss upside, never risks or potential problems
Defensive when asked about risks or issues
Slow to respond to questions (3+ days)
Minimal reporting or transparency on property performance
No clear process for resolving disagreements
High-pressure sales tactics or time-limited offers
What Good Looks Like:
"Main Midlands risks are tenant demand changes, interest rate increases, and unexpected maintenance costs. With this specific property, the boiler is 8 years old - budget for replacement in 2-3 years at £2,000. We respond to urgent questions same-day, general questions within 24 hours. You'll receive monthly statements and have 24/7 access to your property dashboard. If we disagree on a decision, we'll discuss options and ultimately you decide - it's your investment."
The Reference Check Process: What to Ask Previous Investors
Speaking to existing investors is crucial. Here's what to ask:
"How long ago did you purchase, and which Midlands location?"
"What discount from market value did you achieve?"
"How do actual rental income and void periods compare to projections?"
"Were there any unexpected costs or issues?"
"How would you rate their property management (if applicable)?"
"How responsive are they to questions and issues?"
"What's one thing you wish you'd known before working with them?"
"Would you use them again for another property?"
"Would you recommend them to a friend or family member?"
"On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate your overall experience?"
Red Flags in Reference Responses:
Actual results significantly below projections (20%+ variance)
Major unexpected costs not disclosed upfront
Poor communication or slow response times
Management issues (high void periods, maintenance problems)
Wouldn't use them again or recommend to others
Overall rating below 7/10
Online Review Research: Where to Look and What to Trust
Online reviews provide additional perspective, but require careful evaluation:
Where to Look:
Google Reviews (most reliable for property companies)
Trustpilot (if they have a profile)
Facebook Reviews
Property investment forums (Property Tribes, Property Hub)
Companies House (check financial health and director history)
What to Look For:
Overall rating above 4.0/5.0
Consistent positive themes (local knowledge, transparency, results)
How they respond to negative reviews (professional, solution-focused)
Recent reviews (last 6-12 months most relevant)
Specific details in reviews (not generic "great service")
Red Flags:
Overall rating below 3.5/5.0
Consistent negative themes (overpromising, poor communication, hidden fees)
Defensive or aggressive responses to negative reviews
No recent reviews (suggests declining activity)
Generic positive reviews (may be fake)
Companies House shows financial distress or director issues
The Financial Health Check: Ensuring Company Stability
You're trusting this company with a six-figure investment. Check their financial stability:
Companies House Research:
Check latest filed accounts (are they profitable?)
Review director history (frequent director changes are concerning)
Check for county court judgments or legal issues
Verify how long they've been trading
Check if they're up to date with filing requirements
Red Flags:
Consistent losses or declining revenue
Frequent director changes
County court judgments or legal issues
Recently incorporated (less than 3 years)
Late filing or non-compliance with Companies House
Multiple dissolved companies with same directors
The Decision Matrix: Scoring Your Options
Evaluate each company across these criteria (score 1-10 for each):
Local Expertise: Deep knowledge of your target Midlands location
Pricing Transparency: Clear, honest fee disclosure
Track Record: Proven results with verifiable case studies
Due Diligence: Comprehensive property evaluation process
Management Quality: Low void periods, good tenant retention
Service Range: Integrated services and ongoing support
Communication: Transparent, honest, responsive
References: Strong feedback from recent investors
Online Reviews: Positive overall rating and themes
Financial Stability: Healthy, established company
Scoring Guide:
90-100: Excellent choice, proceed with confidence
75-89: Good choice, minor concerns to address
60-74: Acceptable but significant concerns, consider alternatives
Below 60: Avoid, too many red flags
Common Mistakes When Evaluating Property Companies
Mistake 1: Choosing Based on Lowest Fees
A company charging 3% but sourcing at market value costs more than a company charging 5% but delivering 12% discounts. Evaluate total value, not just fees.
Mistake 2: Believing Guaranteed Returns
No one can guarantee property returns. Companies offering guarantees either overprice properties to fund the guarantee or use unsustainable business models.
Mistake 3: Skipping Reference Checks
Speaking to previous investors is the single most valuable evaluation step. Never skip it.
Mistake 4: Ignoring Red Flags
If something feels wrong, it probably is. Don't rationalize away concerns because you're excited about investing.
Mistake 5: Rushing the Decision
Take time to evaluate properly. Companies pressuring quick decisions are showing you how they operate.
Questions That Reveal Company Quality
These questions separate professional companies from poor ones:
"What would you do if you were investing your own money in the Midlands today?" - Reveals their genuine opinion vs sales pitch.
"When would you recommend NOT investing in property?" - Honest companies acknowledge property isn't always the best choice.
"What's the worst property investment mistake you've seen in the Midlands?" - Shows whether they learn from industry mistakes.
"If I don't proceed with this property, will you help me find another?" - Tests whether they're focused on your success or just closing this deal.
"What would make you walk away from a deal?" - Reveals their standards and risk management.
The Bottom Line: Choosing Property Investment Companies in the Midlands
Selecting the right property investment company in Leicester, Nottingham, Warwickshire, or Northamptonshire is one of the most important decisions you'll make as an investor.
The difference between a good company and a poor one can easily be £30,000-50,000 over a 5-year ownership period through better purchase prices, accurate projections, and quality management.
The evaluation process takes time - expect to invest 8-12 hours researching and interviewing companies. This is time well spent when you're making six-figure investment decisions.
Key Principles:
Demand transparency on fees, track record, and processes
Speak to multiple recent investor references
Evaluate total value delivered, not just fees charged
Trust your instincts - if something feels wrong, walk away
Take time to decide - never rush six-figure decisions
The best property investment companies in the Midlands are transparent about pricing, honest about risks, proven through track record, comprehensive in due diligence, and focused on long-term investor success rather than short-term sales.
If a company meets these standards, you've found a partner worth working with. If they don't, keep looking - your investment returns depend on it.
Full House Property Group provides property sourcing, investment consulting, and management services across the Midlands. We welcome thorough evaluation - we believe informed investors make better decisions and build better long-term partnerships. If you'd like to evaluate our services using this framework, we'll provide complete transparency on fees, track record, case studies, and investor references. We're confident we'll score well, and if we don't meet your standards, we'll happily recommend alternatives that do.
.png)
Comments